Hélio Castroneves faces more than 30 years in prison for tax evasion

October 4th, 2008

A chained-up, choked-up Hélio Castroneves could barely two-step into federal court today.

After surrendering to federal authorities, the 33-year-old former Indy 500 champ and Dancing With the Stars winner was escorted by U.S. marshals into the Miami courtroom in handcuffs and leg irons.

Visibly shaken, Castroneves pleaded not guilty to one count of conspiracy and six counts of tax evasion. He was allowed to go free after posting $10 million bail and surrendering his passport, and plans on racing in Atlanta over the weekend.

“It’s been a long day. It’s been an emotional day, obviously,” he told reporters. “I am not guilty.”

The sentiment was echoed by his lawyer, Mark Seiden who blamed the legal tango on bad bookkeeping.

“Hélio is a superb and accomplished professional racing driver. He is not a tax lawyer nor an accountant,” Seiden told E! News.

“He relied upon competent professionals for tax advice, and it’s our position that he did nothing wrong and will be vindicated when this is concluded.”

Castroneves, who lives in Coral Gables, Fla., was indicted Thursday along with his sister and manager, Katiucia Castroneves, 35, and his Ohio-based lawyer, Alan Miller, 71. The trio was accused of using Seven Promotions, a shell corporation based in Panama, to hide more than $5.5 million in income between 1999 and 2004.

According to prosecutors, Hélio claimed he earned only $200,000 in that period. The feds claim he made $2 million alone in sponsorship deals with a Brazilian import-export company. (View the indictment.)

“Using offshore corporations for the purpose of evading taxes is a crime,” says IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “This case sends a clear message that the IRS is committed to vigorously enforcing the lax laws and stopping offshore tax evasion.”

Kati Castroneves and Miller also turned themselves in Friday, but did not enter a plea. They were ordered released on bail of $2 million and $250,000 respectively.

If convicted on all counts, the three face more than 30 years in prison each.

While Hélio was permitted to attend this weekend’s race, he will have to skip an event in Australia later this month due to his travel restrictions.

Castroneves and partner Julianne Hough won the fifth season of ABC’s Dancing With the Stars last November, sashaying their way by Melanie “Scary Spice” Brown and Marie Osmond.

He recently returned to Dancing as a special backstage correspondent for Entertainment Tonight.

Bailout Tax Breaks

October 4th, 2008

Millions of taxpayers, thousands of businesses and groups as diverse as solar power developers and natural disaster victims will see tax relief with the House vote Friday to approve and send to the president a $700 billion financial rescue plan.

The tax relief package attached to the rescue bill promotes renewable energy development and extends dozens of tax breaks from the critical research and development tax credit to breaks for such narrowly focused groups as motor sports racetrack owners, film producers and bicycle commuters.

The renewable energy part of the package alone, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, will “create and save half-a-million good-paying jobs in America immediately.”

Virtually all of the tax breaks already exist. But many of them expired Jan. 1 for use in the current tax year, and the others will expire three months from now unless Congress renews them.

The largest group of beneficiaries in the tax portion of the financial rescue bill is about 20 million mainly upper-middle income taxpayers. Without congressional action, the AMT, with originally was supposed to affect only the very rich, would add some $2,000 this year to the tax bill of these people, most earning under $200,000 a year.

Thousands of businesses are waiting for renewal of the research and development tax credit, which expired at the end of last year. Without that credit, industry advocates say, high tech, biotech and aerospace companies would have trouble hiring the highly skilled workers needed to compete with foreign competitors.

The Information Technology Association of America reports an $18.5 billion drop in R&D activity since the beginning of the year, when the credit lapsed. The R&D credit extension would cost $19 billion over 10 years. The cost of the entire tax portion of the bill is close to $110 billion.

The renewable energy incentives include an eight-year extension of investment credits for solar energy, as well as breaks for wind, geothermal and other alternative sources. The solar industry says extension of the credits through 2016 would produce an extra 440,000 jobs and more than $230 billion in investments.

The measure also has $8 billion in tax breaks for disaster victims, $5 billion for higher education tuition deductions and $400 million in deductions for teachers who buy school supplies with their own money.

There are $3 billion in deductions for residents of states without income taxes that have state and local sales taxes. Extending the deduction would save Texans a projected $1.2 billion a year or an average of $520 per filer claiming the deduction, said Matt Mackowiak, spokesman for Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas.

There are also some four dozen small provisions. Among them, with projected costs over 10 years:

_Extending an expired provision that gives Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands a rebate against excise taxes charged on imported rum. The rebate, at $13.50 per proof gallon, helps finance local infrastructure projects. The cost is $192 million.

_Establishing a new tax credit ranging from $2,500 to $7,500 for purchasers of plug-in electric-drive vehicles. Cost: $758 million.

_Extending tax credits that expired at the end of 2007 for certain domestic corporations involved in American Samoa economic development. Cost: $33 million.

_Extending a credit of up to $10,000 for the training of mine rescue team members. The credit expires at the end of this year and the one-year extension costs $4 million.

_Enacting President Bush’s proposal to erase the debt of the black lung disability trust fund at a cost of $1.3 billion.

_Extending for one year a seven-year depreciation timetable that NASCAR and other motorsport racing facilities have had for some years, the same tax break that amusement parks enjoy. Without the extension, the tracks would have to depreciate the cost of their improvements over 15 years, raising their taxes by $100 million.

_Extending for five years a program that reduces import duties on some wool fabrics. The tariff relief benefits U.S. worsted wool fabric producers that use imported fibers and yarns. Cost: $148 million.

_Increasing the single-year deduction in production costs, from $15 million to $20 million, that film and TV productions may take if the costs are incurred in economically depressed areas. In an effort to keep film and TV productions in the U.S., it also allows more companies to use a domestic production deduction. Cost: $478 million.

_Allowing commercial fishermen and others hurt by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska to average out damage awards over three years rather than taking a one-year hit from the IRS. Cost: $49 million.

_Extending two programs that fund rural schools and rural communities that have been relying on declining income from logging on federal land or have low property tax bases because they are located on or next to federal lands. This is a major issue in the West. Cost: $3.3 billion.

_Exempting wooden practice arrows used by children from an excise tax of 39 cents per arrow. Oregon’s two senators and two Wisconsin representatives previously introduced legislation calling for the action, saying the tax was meant for more expensive archery arrows and is untenable for makers of toy arrows that may cost only about 30 cents apiece. The bill would affect about a half-dozen manufacturers nationwide, including one in Oregon; the Oregon senators said they didn’t seek its addition to the bailout, however. Cost: $2 million.

_Allowing employers to exempt from taxation what they spend on some fringe benefits for workers who commute to work by bicycle, for example reimbursing the cost of parking the bikes. Cost: $2 million.

Some House members and radio-TV commentators have called for eliminating several of the measures, including those affecting wooden arrows, Puerto Rican rum, racetracks and film producers.

“All these things are called sweeteners in order to get votes from Democrats and Republicans in the House,” conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh said at the opening of his show Thursday. “To get this bailout through the Senate and House, they’ve added pork. Surprise, surprise.”

Tax Rebate .. Was it the right thing to do?

August 28th, 2008

All the recent hubbub about the tax rebates has me completely flummoxed and recent reports by the Tax Foundation make me wonder how all this hand waving by Congress & the Executive is actually going help the economy. It’s clear people who are making policy don’t have to do any of the hard work to implement it.

What they’ve managed to cobble together in a matter of weeks will be a logistical nightmare and wont get into the economy for months.

It may be too late now, but if we’re going to have a stimulus package I would be interested in hearing comments on alternatives to an income tax rebate. There are plenty of other taxes we pay besides income taxes.

Wouldn’t a payroll tax holiday would be an easier solution?

No checks would have to go out from the treasury and the effect could be felt immediately by both businesses & employees. Employers would have lower payroll tax deposits and employees would get a larger paycheck. For instance, Congress could declare that from February 1st, no FICA/Medicare tax rates would be due on the first $8000 of wages. That would be equivalent to $612 savings per employee, for the employers and employee with each sharing in the stimulus.

Congress could increase unemployment benefits for the unemployed and bump up Social Security payments to help seniors. These checks are going out to recipients anyway and wouldn’t require special handling by the treasury.

The only group I haven’t been able to quite work out how to “stimulate” is the self-employed. Maybe an increase in the deduction for Self Employment Tax, or a slight decrease the net earnings from self-employment multiplier would reduce the SE tax for the year which would reduce their required estimated tax payments.

Accelerated depreciation could still be included as part of the package to stimulate investment.

It seems easier to help business and employees keep the money they already have than to have them send it to the gov’t which then turns around and sends it right back. Very inefficient.

Creator of the TaxForum.us talks about the forum and comments recent offer from a big tax corporation to buy taxforum.us

April 10th, 2008

Journalist of the TaxHour.com has interviewed the creator of the www.TaxForum.us

- Can you please tell us how did you start the most popular United States tax forum? Where the idea came from?

- Well, I have been working in tax industry for more then 10 years. A lot of times our clients were asking us such a trivial question that they could easily answer themselves if they just visited IRS website. Most of them just wanted to get a quick answer from a professional rather then spending their time on research. I felt if there would be a forum where people can get a quick answers to their tax questions they would save a lot of money on their accounting fees.

First year I did absolutely no work on the site and had domain parked. Second year I put a standard VBulletin skin on it and forgot about it, obviously the site did not bring any money.

In summer 2007 I actually paid a designer $700 to put up a decent design on the site. I consider tax season 2007 to be the first tax season that can be used to analyze the performance of the site. I have to say that the results were quite astonishing for a brand new site. $500/month were so easy I could not believe it. I did absolutely no advertising besides renting avatars on a DP (DigitalPoint.com - a very famous forum among webmasters). Probably that was a really idea.

During 2007 tax season the site gained about 700 new members. Currently average sign up rate is 10 members a day and not just some members, but POSTING members every members makes posts and participates in the community. I am sure people who run forums know how hard is to build a community and have posting members.

So far the forum has a very bright future. The traffic is growing from day to day. Search engines love the site (and they should because all the content is 100% original). There are so many keywords on which TaxForum.us beats older and bigger tax and financial sites and sites that belong to huge corporations.

- What are the features that TaxForum.us offers to its members besides forums?

- Right now the site includes a directory of the tax preparers in the United States that has more 80,000 records (http://findataxpreparer.taxforum.us/). We are currently working on the TaxTips module where users will be able to rank tax tip and by doing that ensure that the best useful tax tips would be displayed to the visitors first. This should save people a lot of time and prevent from reading useless or outdated information.

- How many people visit TaxForum.us?

- TaxForum.us started from 50 visits a day at the beginning of the tax season 2007. By the end of the tax season our forums were averaging more then 3000 visits a day. I feel that shows a great value site brings to people.

- How would you estimate the first tax season of the TaxForum.us?

I think it is not a bad start for any forum. The site definitely has a huge potential. The relationship with its members will be strengthened through the smart email campaign (that is something I did not try this year).

Most of the traffic comes from United States and is brought by the search engine and word of the mouth.

- How much time do spend working on TaxForum.us per week?

- Right now I spend about 1-2 hours a week on the site going through the posting moderating them. Luckily the site has got many expert members that can answer questions of other people.

- Is that true that one of the largest tax services companies has made a offer to buy TaxForum.us?

- Yes, a very well known tax company has offered $xxx,xxx amount for TaxForum.us. Due to the huge potential of the site I will not be willing to sell a truly this unique site that well positioned itself in its niche.

If I do not get a price that will satisfy me I will keep the site, add couple of new features that benefit the users and will enjoy running this exciting web community that brings so much value to its members.

Get free tax advice from www.TaxForum.us

February 11th, 2008

The times when you had to pay big chunks of money to your accountants to file your 1040’s are long gone and probably will not come back any time soon (unless something really unusual will happen to United States tax system). Cheap tax preparation services and tax filing software made tax filing much less expensive in comparison with even 4 years ago. Nowadays anyone can do (or at least try to do) thier taxes by following step by steps screen and answering Yes/No questions.

But are people ready to take advantage of all the tools available to them? Do people have enough knowledge of the tax laws so they can file taxes correctly and not make expensive mistakes?

Probably yes, people can file their taxes correctly, if they make sure that they follow all of the steps when using a tax filing software. Though it is not always easy to do that. Errors may result due to a confusing tax terminology. Not everyone know what is the difference between the tax deduction or tax credit. Not everyone knows if the donations they have made throughout the year are tax deductible or not or who is responsible to report taxes on the gift (a person who gave a gift or the one who recieved it). So some knowledge of taxes is definitely required, even when using the best tax filing software.

A great way to get so much needed tax advice for no cost is offered by a new web forum www.TaxForum.us. The site became hugely popular during tax season 2006, when more then 100,000 visitors has visited the site. Hundreds of people have become regular TaxForum members and regularly visit the site to get an advice about different aspects of the tax law.

“Sometimes all you are missing is a keyword, a small detail. A brief answer can lead you to solving your tax problem. And the best part of it - it is absolutely free. Before, when I needed a tax advice, I tried to use Craigslist and Yahoo Answers, but waiting time there is just too long: you have to wait for days or sometimes weeks to get a reply. It usally takes less then few hours to get an answer, often someone will reply to your within 5 minutes.” - says Andrew Vikelbaum, one of the regular members, about TaxForum.

Besides a forum, where people can communicate with each other and get the answers to their tax questions, TaxForum.us has a lot to offer to its members. Visitors are welcome to download tax forms, browse through a tax link directory, watch tax related video syndicated from the most popular video streaming websites.

People looking for a tax preparer in their town or local area can use TaxForum’s database of 35,000 US tax accountants to do their search. The search results not only return a name, address and a phone number of the tax accounting office, but also a geographical map of the office location.

The community website like TaxForum.us is a great addition to all the tax filing technologies readily available to the mass public. If you have not become a member of the site, I strongly encourage you to do that for your own benefit.

Proposed Law Would Tax Video Games, Equipment

January 22nd, 2008

A proposed bill in Wisconsin would add an extra sales tax to electronics.Dedicated gamer Justin Sallows said the tax doesn’t sit well with him.”I think that’s a real problem,” said Sallows. “Even if that’s not what the intention is, it creates the impression that there’s something wrong with the video games because we need to put some extra tax on there to try to dissuade people from playing them.”The bill’s author, state Sen. Jon Erpenbach, said the money raised from the tax isn’t to dissuade gamers, but to help cover the cost to move 17-year-olds, who commit non-violent crimes, back into the juvenile system. Currently, 17-year-olds are treated as adults, WISC-TV reported.The costs for the move could be substantial, Erpenbach said.”No. 1, I think it’s the right thing to do because not all 17-year-olds belong in the adult system when it comes to non-violent offenses,” said Erpenbach. “But secondly, in the long run, the numbers show that if you treat certain situations in a juvenile delinquent-type of a setting, as opposed to an adult setting, chances are there’s going to be less of a problem when the kid gets older.”But the part of the bill getting the most attention is the video game tax.”The idea being that this is kind of a kids-kids thing, in other words, if we’re going to do this for kids maybe this would be a good way to go about it. And if it’s not the best way, I’m open to any other way,” he said.One mother, out buying games for her kids, said the idea seemed sound.”I think I’m going to buy them anyway even if the extra money is there,” said Katie Humbolt. “So, I think it’s a good way.”But Sallows disagrees. At age 37, he said it’s not only children getting the games.”I just think it’s pretty unfair to attack gamers and have them pay for something they, more than likely, have nothing to do with,” said Sallows.Erpenbach said at this point, he’s not sure how much it would cost to move non-violent 17-year-olds to the juvenile system.The cost could be substantial considering state records show that of the approximately 30,000 17-year-olds arrested each year, 98 percent are charged with minor offenses.Lawmakers are also not sure how much the tax would generate.Nationwide the gaming industry is worth about $8 billion, WISC-TV reported.

Barack Obama’s Tax Cut for Middle Class and Seniors

January 22nd, 2008

Algona, IA - At a town hall meeting at Algona High School, U.S. Senator Barack Obama today discussed his bold and innovative plan to cut taxes for working Americans. By standing up to the special interests and fighting for working Americans’ interests, Senator Obama will cut taxes for those who need it most: middle-class families and seniors. Obama’s plan will also restore fairness to the tax code.

“I’m in this race to take those tax breaks away from companies that are moving jobs overseas and put them in the pockets of hard working Americans who deserve it, and I’m the only candidate in this race to introduce a middle-class tax cut that will give 95% of working Americans a break,” Senator Obama said. “We don’t need any more tax breaks for the wealthiest corporations who didn’t need them and didn’t ask for them - it’s time to give a break to working folks so that we put the American Dream within the reach of every American once more. That’s why I’m running for President.”

Obama’s plan would provide relief and support for our middle class and honor seniors, such Mary Paige of Cedar Rapids, by eliminating federal income taxes for those making less than $50,000 a year. Ms. Paige, participated in a roundtable discussion with Senator Obama on Friday at Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids. Under Obama’s plan, Ms. Paige would no longer pay federal income taxes.

Senator Obama’s tax-fairness plan also includes a new “Making Work Pay” tax credit of up to $1,000 for America’s working families, creates a new universal mortgage interest credit that will benefit low and middle-income homeowners, simplifies tax filings so millions of Americans can do their taxes in less than 5 minutes, eliminates special interest loopholes and tax breaks and cracks down on international tax havens.

Obama would pay for his tax reform plan by closing corporate loopholes, cracking down on international tax havens, closing the carried interest loophole, and increasing the dividends and capital gains rate for the top bracket.

A credit card can easily go bad. With bad credit credit cards turn wary too. Therefore amex has a proclivity for a 0 credit card rather than a messy one.

Taxes On Mutual Funds Capital Gains

January 21st, 2008

Often when tax season nears, mutual fund investors become confused. Why do we have to pay taxes on a fund that had a losing year?

By law, mutual funds must declare distributions each year. These distributions represent a profit the fund made when selling securities. Every year, usually in December, the fund will pay out these gains to the shareholders in the form of income dividends and/ or capital gains.

Even in years with negative returns, mutual funds can, and must, pay out distributions. Capital gains are calculated by taking the price you sold the security for and subtracting your purchase price (cost basis). It doesn’t matter if the securities that the fund held were doing poorly, all that matters is that the fund sold the security at a profit and must now pay out the profits in the form of a distribution, which is a taxable event for the shareholder.

To better understand how this could happen, imagine your fund bought a security in 1997 for $15 a share.

At the start of 2000, the security was worth a total of $30 a share, but the fund ended up selling the security for only $25 a share. This is a loss for the year, but an overall profit of $10 a share. Another possibility would be for the fund to sell the security for $35 a share, which is a gain even for the most current year, but the rest of the funds holdings went sour and created a losing year for the fund. This fund would still be forced to pay out capital gains on the security that they sold.

What if the fund has capital losses?

It is possible that the fund did not make a profit off selling its securities. In the case of capital losses, the fund would not pay out a distribution (although they could pay income distributions). The fund would apply the loss to future capital gains.

What if I signed up to automatically reinvest the dividends?

This is still considered a taxable event. Reinvested dividends are treated as cash payments.

What if I bought the fund one day before the distribution was declared?

Sorry, but you are out of luck. It doesn’t matter whether you held the fund for one day or for 10 years, you are still stuck with paying taxes on the distribution. This is why advisers usually recommend that you never buy a fund right before it pays a distribution. The distribution does lower the net asset value (NAV), allowing you to deduct it when you sell the fund, but paying the taxes sooner rather than later prevents you from gaining investment income on the amount that is taxed.

Many people get into the snare of cheap travel insurance and similar deals like cheap car insurance owing to incomplete knowledge. They need insurance quotes and germane information, not some vague info about pet insurance.

IMF Concludes Lower Tax Rates Can Yield More Tax Revenue

January 21st, 2008

A new study from the International Monetary Fund looks at what happened in Russia after the 13 percent flat tax was implemented and concludes that there was a Laffer Curve effect. Indeed, the increase in taxable income was so large that it completely offset the impact of the lower tax rate. In other words, this was one of the rare cases of a tax cut “paying for itself” (in the vast majority of cases, lower tax rates generate revenue feedback, but the net result is still less money for government).

Interestingly, the study finds that the additional revenue materialized because people are more willing to obey the law when the tax rate is low, as theory would predict, but did not find an increase in labor supply, which theory also would predict This anomaly aside, it is still good news that the IMF recognizes that there is a Laffer Curve and that high tax rates are needlessly destructive:

Can tax rate cuts increase revenues?

…The Russian flat tax experiment is particularly interesting: after the introduction of flat taxes, and effective personal income tax rate cuts, tax revenues increased substantially and almost immediately. Furthermore, they increased much faster than labor supply and output. The paper explains how tax rate cuts can increase tax revenues through tax compliance spillovers in such a manner.

…This paper shows that endogenous tax compliance responses can be responsible for the massive increase in tax revenues. The key intuition is that tax regimes are prone to spillovers, as the aggregate behavior of taxpayers determines how much time the tax authority can dedicate to the individual taxpayer. In a way, tax evaders protect each other by tying down the tax authority’s limited capacity. Hence, small cuts in the tax rates can lead to much larger changes in the behavior of taxpayers — most importantly, it can make them much more likely to declare their incomes honestly. These spillovers can lead to increasing tax revenues.

…taxpayers evade less tax payments when the tax rate is lower… evasion increases with the tax rate.

…Three cases could be highlighted. First, countries with high official tax rates and relatively weaker tax authorities, such as some of the transition economies, might benefit from tax rate cuts and improving compliance. Second, the model might be also relevant for countries with high tax rates, even if tax enforcement seems to be strong in absolute terms. Third, low tax countries which have particularly weak tax enforcement could also think about improving tax compliance via tax rate cuts.

TurboTax vs Tax Cut

January 21st, 2008

The holidays are over: Its now the start of tax season. So for many of us its time to get on the computer and do our taxes.But which program to use?

Turbotax and TaxCut are the big players when it comes to tax software.Both get better with each passing year. But which is tops in 2008?

Consumer Reports Magazine tested last years version and found TurboTax a “bit more convenient.” USA Today also said TurboTax gives a “smoother ride.” But it calls TaxCut a “bargain,” with TaxCut’s premium version 25% cheaper than TurboTax.

For 2008, TurboTax Deluxe –including e-filing of Federal and state taxes –comes to roughly $74.TaxCut Premium — also with filing — runs $62.

Why are those prices so high? Reviewers say dont be fooled by $19 basic versions: They dont include state taxes or e-fling fees. Include state tax and e-filing fees, and you are up above $60 with either product.

A less expensive, highly rated alternative? Consider TaxAct. The Basic version is free…. and a Premium version will cost you less that $30.

Borrowing loans is acceptable as long as you know how you are going to pay it back. Sometimes a personal loan becomes unavoidable. People often use a payday loan for that purpose. However, beware that any loan can turn into a bad credit loan.